TCG Stories

One starts to wonder if Bring A Trailer's strategy is to sell so many cars that the community doesn't notice when it screws up, big time. Most of you probably missed this auction for a 2017 Porsche 911 Carrera S Cabriolet, which was withdrawn by BaT after $50,000 in bids had been logged. The reason for being withdrawn? The car didn't exist, aside from in the entry form submitted by a seller who was very close to securing a significant wire transfer while providing nothing in return. 

I have it on good authority that this 911 was pitched to another auction site that managed to catch the issues, which were numerous. As pointed out in the comments section of the BaT listing, the warning signals were obvious if you cared enough to Google the VIN (BaT didn't). It revealed a car sold in the past year with: 

1) different seats;
2) different wheels and tires;
3) completely different rear badging stating it was an "S," with current badges stating it’s a 4S (which per the VIN, it was not);
4) and additional discrepancies listed in the BaT comments.

In addition, the listing showed two different VIN numbers in the gallery photos, with one linking back to a 911 sold on PCarMarket and another sold via Carvana in May '23. Guess what? Cars can't have two VINs, and almost anyone with half a brain could deduct that the seller simply got sloppy in submitting the wrong pictures from two different listings as opposed to just sticking with one set of numbers. Either way, they were well on their way to a payday by simply submitting a listing with photos pulled from a five minute Google search. 

BaT is a large operation these days. I applied for an auction specialist role a few years back and the only way to move forward was to leave my full-time job to take a 40-hour-per-week job them, along with a nearly 75 percent reduction in pay. The fact that they demanded full-time employment indicated to me that their operations were on another level compared to its competitors; now, I know that's not true.

If BaT's intake team can't even Google the VIN before a listing goes live, what does that tell you about their overall approach to quality control? To me, it says it's non-existent. It also lends further credence to the belief that any car you buy on its platform being thoroughly vetted is a complete falsehood. You stand as much chance buying a good car on BaT as you do from the corner used car lot. 

I don't have an auction platform; I simply have a way to offer additional proof from upstanding sellers that their car is their car, and that they have been steadily investing in it since taking ownership. With more transactions moving to an entirely digital format, it's time we start demanding better from BaT and requiring safeguards that protect buyers from unscrupulous sellers. 

It's amazing to me that car buyers still willingly hand over significant sums of money without knowing what they're buying. It's one thing to buy a car with some gaps in its mechanical history, but to purchase a so-called "restored" car with horribly dodgy repairs clearly intended to mask massive shortcomings in a vehicle's integrity is the sort of oversight that shouldn't still be happening. 

Uncle Tony's Garage is somewhat popular YouTube channel that lately has been calling out the scoundrels of the car collecting hobby, and this latest episode features a Mercury Cougar sold via auction to a collector who paid for a "restored" car - the trouble is, the paint job was the convenient distraction from a total hack job underneath. 

As the video goes to show, the mechanic tasked with inspecting his customer's purchase has the unenviable task of telling the buyer that has has paid $40,000 for a car that needs an additional $40,000 worth of bodywork. The video doesn't lie, showing what looks like a mixture of bondo and undercoating to paper over massive holes in the Mercury's floor and frame. Uncle Tony points out that buyers routinely go to car auctions and effectively hold their breath and jump into costly investments with little to no proof of the integrity of the restoration work.

If the industry had standards that encouraged buyers to see proof of a seller's claims, or if the auction houses themselves embraced such an approach, incidents like these would happen far less frequently. But for the time being, the canned response is often that a buyer should have done their homework. 

If auction houses shamed bad sellers and utilized technology tools that provide an exploded view of a car's mechanical and cosmetic integrity, perhaps stories such as the one told here would happen far less frequently. 

For the last few months, I have been moonlighting as an auction specialist for one of the top three digital auction sites. The experience has been enlightening, especially as it relates to how sellers view their cars.

Some view them as investments, but the majority don't seem to perceive their oftentimes limited-production specialty vehicle as an item worth presenting to the best of their abilities. While I realize there are many daily drivers that now fall under the heading of limited-production and/or enthusiast-grade, many sellers seem to treat them like any other commuter car.

Because so many manufacturers are building enthusiast-friendly vehicles, there's an accompanying upkeep need that goes along with that. High performance components like brakes, tires, adjustable suspension, light-weight body panels and so on demand that sellers have records that back up a lifetime (however short that may be) of ongoing, proactive maintenance.

One of the stranger habits involves Porsche 996 owners. We all know by now the IMS bearing is a source of concern and value-killing detail if not verified in the car's history. A seller of a 911 was fairly unaffected by the fact he didn't get a record of some kind from the selling dealer that swore up and down the IMS was replaced. Sorry - if I'm buying a 911 and paying dealership prices, you better believe I'm not leaving until I have documentation in hand that the IMS was done. On the car in question, there was a loan, and it blew my mind that the seller didn't pursue the dealer like a hungry dog on a bone to get access to those records, or otherwise bring the car back in and demand proof of the work being done. 

Sellers, do yourself a favor and don't underscore the need for strong records. If you have them, use them (or better yet, scan and store them with TheCommonGear.com) and don't think for a second that one invoice or parts receipt can't swing a sale price $10,000 in your favor. 

A few days ago, Tom Cotter - the so-called "Barn Find Hunter" - visited a place I've never been but would love to go, the Owls Head Museum in Maine. In this segment, he runs through how the Museum acquires cars from various collections and estates after owners pass on, thus allowing the Museum to either exhibit the car or to sell it and use the proceeds to address operational expenses.

In this episode, he looks at a genuine Austin Healey 100 LeMans, an exceedingly rare car built with factory performance enhancements. A scarce few of them were assembled on the factory production lines with these upgrades, while the bulk of them were conceived via disparate parts installations at the dealership level. The curator of the Museum explains how the donated Healey is one of the small batch of examples built at the factory with the LeMans upgrades, a fact he was able to confirm via a data plate that had been previously removed and left under the front passenger seat.

As he goes on to say, that's potentially a $50,000 discovery. He's not wrong: in "Good" condition, Hagerty considers it a $140,000 car. As you can imagine, finding this car without the coveted tag could represent a whack of $25,000 - $50,000. That's why we push so hard for our clients to document everything, as when it comes time to sell, a thoroughly-documented vehicle can see upwards of a 10- to 20 percent increase in its sale price.

At The Common Gear, we'll ensure your vital records are captured digitally and preserved for the future, whether it's simply to share the history of your car among friends or to drive home a stronger sale price at auction.  

These days, collector cars of a certain caliber truly are investment pieces. Whether used as a way to move your money around via backchannels or simply because the car in question is rocketing up in value, there's no denying that at a certain level, a car is like any other asset that requires strong documentation and legal protections. 

There's a consignment specialist in south Florida that specializes in extremely desirable Italian cars, owing to its founder's long-standing family history with Lamborghini. John Temerian is the founder of Curated, and the name alone should tell you what he specializes in for consignment vehicles. He finds cars on behalf of his clients that are exceedingly rare and require high levels of documentation to ensure the car is what Curated claims it to be. At his level and price point, a misstep in any sort of provenance claims is a mistake that can cost deep into the six-figures.

Put simply, John is a guy we can emphasize with in terms of understanding the value of a deep paper trail supporting a particular car. Which is why we were more than a little surprised to see him using a Word document as a means of conveying to the next owner of a long-missing Vector W8 the critical information establishing it as the car he claimed it was. John conducted numerous interviews and worked with attorneys and other legal experts who knew about the car's checkered past to compile all of the necessary data to validate its existence. This sleuthing was also appreciated by the sellers, who obviously wanted to confirm that there was no outstanding legal concerns on the car, which had been re-possessed by Lamborghini at one point in time.

All of this is to say, seeing a guy a like John not using The Common Gear to track, store, and log receipts and build sheets and affidavits makes me wonder what it would take to get him to log all of his consignment vehicle documentation onto the website we've built. If anyone knows John or has a way to get in front of him, please let me know - we'd love to see him and his stunning collection securely documented on our digital curation platform. 

One of the better accounts I follow on Instagram is a Californian by the name of "Rad Report", who started a quasi-newsletter a few years ago highlighting so-called "rad"-era vehicles for sale on craigslist. Like many others, he soon discovered that while people love to consume free content, they rarely like paying for it.

So, unlike others before him, he didn't bend to their will: he just stopped providing the newsletter, deciding that his page was better suited to using his network to sell and promote his own vehicles.

He recently penned a few statements about why he doesn't use Bring A Trailer to sell his cars, as he almost always gets the question when one of his well-preserved and/or restored 1980s rides goes up for sale. He summed up what a lot of us feel, which is that the Bring A Trailer model relies too heavily on commenters who can seriously derail an auction, even with blatantly false information. He basically points to the desire to retain some control over the sales process, and highlights that craigslist - for all of its failings - is basically a blank canvas for anyone with a car worth selling to go hog wild in their description. 

Check out the screen captures below and tell me you don't feel the same. The idea that the peanut gallery on BaT somehow can propel your car to a better sale price is hogwash; your own attention to detail and comprehensive record-keeping is far more compelling than listening to an armchair quarterback go off on how your car is trash because the date codes on your tires are too old. 

I have no desire to take down a viable player in the digital auction arena, but I do tend to agree that sellers should prioritize finding channels and outlets (such as this website) that allow you to tell your car's story in the most content-rich format possible rather than a stripped down and templated form that that neuters the narrative. 

In the collector car world, there’s an unusual divide that has formed between those who preserve cars in their original (if not slightly flawed) state and those that prefer to open the checkbook and finance a lengthy restoration. Like a true conundrum, there is no “right” answer, but both sides came to a head recently when architect and car collector Jonathan Segal was put on blast for stripping his barn-find 1956 Maserati A6G/54 to bare metal.

Segal bought one of the more memorable barn finds of the last decade when he purchased the A6G out of a somewhat notorious estate of Parisian entrepreneur Roger Baillon, who had amassed a large collection of desirable automobiles despite supposedly having significant financial liabilities. When the Maserati was found in a garage on the property, it was covered in newspapers but largely complete.

The car was supposedly very straight-forward to make operational again, with the drivetrain coming back to life with basic sorting. While Segal did show the car in its highly-patina’d state, it didn’t say that way for long and he soon commissioned a frame-off restoration. It’s worth noting he tried to sell the car in its as-found condition, found no buyers, and then decided that the most direct path to potential profits was to restore it to the highest standards possible.

He was quickly vilified by numerous members of the vintage and collector car communities, with criticisms hurled at him that included references to his restoration project being on the same level as “…sandblasting the colosseum.” He rebuffed these accusations and I don’t blame him for doing so. Here’s the thing: as much as well-preserved vehicles are undoubtedly special and often endearing, there are also compromises that go along with that, and some owners simply don’t care for compromises.

A restored version of Segal’s Maserati will likely outshine his striking 1956 Maserati AG6 Zagato, a vehicle that recently took first in class at Villa de Este. And there’s the point: he has a car that can be comfortably driven, shown, and toured with that only grows more valuable as more onlookers see it and gawk at its beauty, while simultaneously standing in shock that it can drive at highway speeds with relative comfort. A patina’d car could be put back to running condition with the roughshod exterior left in place, but that approach doesn’t win awards - and an award at the best show or shows is absolutely the goal of well-moneyed collectors who understand that winning at Pebble Beach is as much a gateway to more wealth and power as being named to the board of directors at Amazon.

Jonathan Segal doesn’t care what you think about his car’s restoration, and if you wanted to preserve its as-found condition, you should have stepped up to buy it when it was for sale. The Maserati will be stunning when finished, and hopefully, Mr. Segal will some day track his project updates here on TheCommonGear.com to ensure no one can question his level of commitment to the brand, or the investment he has made in these significant collector cars.

Recently, we noticed a batch of Japanese sports coupes taking home some surprising numbers on Bring A Trailer and Cars & Bids. In an era where there’s some modest cooling of the marketplace, seeing three decidedly commonplace vehicles each handily clear $20,000 was worthy of analysis.

We looked at the following cars: a 1997 Nissan 240SX that sold for $27,250; a SW20 chassis Toyota MR2 Turbo for $29,250; and the real kicker, a 1983 Datsun 280ZX Turbo for a heady $25,000. These are all very strong numbers, and while there’s been plenty said about some unusually high exchanges of money on BaT, these cars were not expensive enough to suggest a backdoor card game of the digital sort; no, these were just three pools of bidders who really, really wanted otherwise unremarkable cars.

Buyers of Japanese classics are their own breed. European car fanatics get caught up in provenance, maintenance history, and whether someone who once lived on the same street as Brian Redman owned the car in question. For purveyors of Japanese models, the scale is tilted far more towards how stock the car remains and whether the bidder owned the same car in their 20s. It’s not to say nostalgia doesn’t matter for European car shoppers; quite the opposite, in fact: have you ever listened to a man blubber about justifying paying $120,000 for an air-cooled 911?

But that same 911 buyer will have a strong bead on the likelihood they’ll make some money on their long-hood time machine. The guy dropping $30,000 on an S14 240SX is not thinking about ROI, just that he wrapped the same car around a tree in 11th grade (ah, memories - powerful stuff.) In a way, the buyers of those cars are transported back to high school, knowing full well they’d spend all of dad’s money if given the chance to pay full retail for their adolescent dream car.

How else do you justify dumping $25,000 on one of the most unremarkable Z cars ever made? Listen, I’ve made plenty of bad decisions when it comes to cars, but I couldn’t live the life some Japanese car enthusiasts do where they don’t even flinch at bidding the lights out if the car in question is the model they once almost owned, or previously lost to a tragedy or teenage hijinks.

All that is to say, don’t expect your dad’s old Z car to suddenly be an auction-worthy specimen, or a tired MR2 to be worth any more than the $10,000 or so they typically command. It takes the right buyer, the right car, and timing that is entirely dependent on the cosmic alignment of the universe. While we may find the high rollers on the European side of the house unsufferable on occasion, they are at least consistent.

This is not meant as a bragging post, but more a spotlight on what's possible when you have a deep digital records portfolio for your specialty vehicle. My 2011 BMW 328xi 6-speed wagon recently left for a new home after five years in my possession, and the presentation on The Common Gear - which included pages of records scanned and stored going back to the last owner - helped clinch a no haggle sale. 

I will freely admit there are some cars that even the most robust presentation doesn't make much of a difference on. My Audi V8 Quattro, which we'll discuss in a few days as it recently sold on Bring A Trailer, was a vehicle that was simply too obscure to benefit from an expansive overview. But it was also a car where it was inherently evident that I was not a long-term steward and was clearly looking to remove it quickly or mark it as a notch on my flipper belt (that didn't work out.) 

Buyers love long-term owners, and they especially love ones that have put in the time and money to properly care for a special car. My wagon was the last of the inline-six-powered, manual transmission-equipped wagons, so it was always going to have a following - but The Common Gear made it possible to drive a very fair sale price with no haggling and a largely seamless transaction with an out-of-state buyer. 

We can do it for you - and you can get started today by creating a free account. 

I don't often talk about the collector insurance car behemoth Hagerty outside of referencing its continued influence in the hobby car space. However, the company's largess was on full display as I raced to secure a modest loan from my credit union to buy a car over a recent weekend. 

Typically, I use JC Taylor for my hobby vehicles. They are very affordable and responsive over email. Hagerty has always been more expensive and also requires the annual premium be paid in full, which is kind of a drag. All that aside, the company thoroughly trounced JC Taylor in this most recent interaction.

Despite calling JC Taylor on a Wednesday and informing them I needed a policy written and the binder in hand showing the credit union as the loss payee before Saturday, when I was to pick up the car, they hadn't moved the policy to underwriting as of Thursday at noon. I was promised it was happening momentarily, but when I called back an hour later, the next phone representative I spoke with noted she could see the last representative still hadn't actually sent it to underwriting. 

The third representative I spoke with on Friday said there was no way she could guarantee I would have the binder in time for my trip to the credit union. By this point, I was feeling pretty frustrated, so I called Hagerty and within the 15 minutes I was on the phone with their specialist, I had an insurance binder sitting in my email. I fired it over to the credit union, and picked up the check an hour later. 

To Hagerty's credit, no explanation was needed regarding the urgency of the situation. The gentleman I spoke with acted as if he was the one buying the car. The four different representatives at JC Taylor not only seemed completely nonplussed by the urgency (a situation of their own making) but also raised doubts as to why I would want a collector policy on a "modern" vehicle like the E55. Hagerty raised no such concerns, which is also why they insure my Eurovan, which JC Taylor would not cover out of an unfounded suspicion I would use the van for risky adventure-seeking exploits. 

All in all, it's unacceptable that a company like JC Taylor could not move with the speed car enthusiasts need when it comes to snagging an elusive vehicle. As a long-time customer, I was bummed that they fell well short of expectations in this go-round, but grateful Hagerty was there to close the deal.